------- Comment #5 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2007-01-02 12:02 ------- Subject: Re: New: '#define false FALSE' undefines '#define FALSE false'
"h8_spam at sonic dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I ran into an issue where doing #define FALSE false followed by #define false | FALSE undefined the first FALSE which is not what I would expect. | | Perhaps this is part of the standard, but in case not, I'm reporting it. During the translation phases 3-6, `true' and `false' are pp-tokens with special meanings. See 16.1/4. I don't know how common this PR is, to warrant a warning. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30348