------- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-12-21 15:44 -------
(In reply to comment #1)

Changing the FORALL to a DO loop is a workaround.  Something strange is
happening in the forall assignment.

Thanks

Paul


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30273

Reply via email to