------- Comment #4 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-12-16 19:28 -------
Steve posted his fix at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01012.html
and I came up with an improved version that correctly identifies the
equivalence
of "z" and "z(:)" here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01094.html
Sorry for the inconvenience. It looks like I introduced this regression whilst
restructuring gfc_dep_resolver. As penance, I'm currently investigating a
related gfortran optimization, that can use the proposed gfc_full_array_ref_p,
to improve the code generated for your POSL function even further.
--
roger at eyesopen dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |roger at eyesopen dot com
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30207
