------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-12-14 03:59 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> but only if we don't honor NaNs or signed zeros.

Some of these optimizations can be done even without worrying about NaNs
because of -fcx-limited-range .


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30172

Reply via email to