------- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 05:43
-------
Case 2 was filed as PR 29792 and was declared invalid.
Though we get currently:
.uleb128 0x2 # (DIE (0x25) DW_TAG_subprogram)
.ascii "foo\0" # DW_AT_name
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file (no-inlined-instance-record.c)
.byte 0x2 # DW_AT_decl_line
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_prototyped
.long 0x40 # DW_AT_type
.byte 0x3 # DW_AT_inline
.long 0x40 # DW_AT_sibling
.uleb128 0x3 # (DIE (0x36) DW_TAG_formal_parameter)
.ascii "x\0" # DW_AT_name
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file (no-inlined-instance-record.c)
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_line
.long 0x40 # DW_AT_type
.byte 0x0 # end of children of DIE 0x25
Case 1, is also too hard to fix as it would make us lose a lot of
optimizations.
Really what GCC is producing is the best debugging you can get for these
functions.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23551
