------- Comment #3 from michael dot meissner at amd dot com  2006-12-04 23:21 
-------
I've done some analysis on the test case.  The current GCC 4.2 and mainline
branches no longer generate the initial push of %r8, but instead do a subq
$8,%rsp.  I believe in the compiler you used it did the push to allocate 8
bytes of stack instead of the subtract.  Note, the epilogue still uses a pop to
remove the stack location.  The core of the problem is that the compiler is
allocating 8 bytes too much stack in this particular case.  I think I
understand whats going on, but I want to dig a bit more.


-- 

michael dot meissner at amd dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |michael dot meissner at amd
                   |                            |dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25295

Reply via email to