------- Comment #26 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 20:43 ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Subject: Re: implement unformatted files with subrecords > (Intel style) > > I have reviewed the patch and I have one minor comment. I suggest that the > continued flag be placed in with the unit flags similar to has_recl. Only > for > consistency. I am in the process of testing still.
Hi Jerry, looking at the unit_flags struct, I notice that all components are determined by flags set on the I/O statement. Putting the continued flag doesn't seem right to me. Apart from that, I have put in a better error message and am currently in the process of bootstrapping and regtesting. Hopefully, I'll be able to submit tomorrow. Thanks for your help! Thomas -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29568
