------- Comment #2 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-08 21:44 -------
I do not understand you comment.
That is, from 'make' manpage:
"
-k Continue as much as possible after an error. While the target
that failed, and those that depend on it, cannot be remade, the
other dependencies of these targets can be processed all the same.
"
- my point was that there were failing tests. And my implied questions were:
1) do the failing tests indicate problems in gcc ?
2) do the failing test fail because they themselves are faulty ?
After 'make check':
"
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-8.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-9.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/special/gcsec-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/weak.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: abi_check
".
After 'make -k check':
"
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-8.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/cleanup-9.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/special/gcsec-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/weak.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: abi_check
FAIL: gctest
".
Could you please answer the:
"
1) do the failing tests indicate problems in gcc ?
2) do the failing test fail because they themselves are faulty ?
"
questions ?
Thanks in advance.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29760
