------- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-11-03 15:08 ------- Indeed, we badly need details. The correct output (which indeed I can see on any machine I have at hand, any version of gcc) is: 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 2 1 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29696
