------- Comment #23 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 09:21 ------- > Maybe so, but that would most likely be by accident, not by design. In > fact, that probably indicates an optimization regression in the recent > changes to VRP.
No disagreement, I was merely updating the status of the PR, whose summary can now be slightly misleading, precisely to acknowledge that the latter should not be changed at this point. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26797
