------- Comment #6 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2006-10-21 11:28 ------- Thanks, Tom! I updated some packages I maintain and verified that this indeed nicely fixes the problem.
As for GCC 4.1, as you say, I don't think it's strictly needed, though it could be useful for some (using GCC 4.0 and GCC 4.1 in parallel for example). Your call, I'd say. In any case, thanks a lot for tackling this problem! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29205
