------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 14:28 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > You need to look at preprocessed source. sig_atomic_t should have volatile > qualifier on it.
It is not marked for glibc 2.4: typedef int __sig_atomic_t; typedef __sig_atomic_t sig_atomic_t; So this is still not a GCC bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29429
