------- Comment #21 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-09-27 08:07 ------- (In reply to comment #20) > First of all, the problem is that bad that even 1*z != z when *no* > optimisation is requested.
Yes :( > Secondly, could somebody clarify how patch > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00560.html is related to these > issues? Part of that patch seems to deal with fixing NaN's that should be > Infs. Was it ever applied? Certainly, on 2005-02-11, and much more afterwards. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28408
