------- Comment #2 from cummings at cacr dot caltech dot edu 2006-09-26 23:32 ------- Yes, I read through both the gfortran and the older g77 documentation on this before I posted my bug report. However, I am puzzled as to why there is no support for this third optional argument to the signal() function when all other gcc-compatible compilers such as Intel ifort, PathScale pathf90, and Portland Group pgf77 have this. I guess I don't see how you can pass a flag to your signal handler function without this argument. Hopefully, someone who has contributed to this portion of the gfortran code base will comment on this. By the way, just to clarify, I am talking about the intrinsic function form of signal(), not the subroutine form in which there is a third argument to contain the result of the call to signal().
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29240
