------- Comment #8 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2006-09-14 
02:18 -------
Andrew,
    I just noticed that the same code fragment exists in
rs6000_darwin64_record_arg_recurse
as well as in rs6000_darwin64_record_arg_advance_recurse. Shouldn't we then
make the patch...

Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c  (revision 116941)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c  (working copy)
@@ -4607,7 +4607,10 @@ rs6000_darwin64_record_arg_advance_recur
       {
        HOST_WIDE_INT bitpos = startbitpos;
        tree ftype = TREE_TYPE (f);
-       enum machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (ftype);
+       enum machine_mode mode;
+       if (ftype == error_mark_node)
+         continue;
+       mode = TYPE_MODE (ftype);

        if (DECL_SIZE (f) != 0
            && host_integerp (bit_position (f), 1))
@@ -4975,7 +4978,10 @@ rs6000_darwin64_record_arg_recurse (CUMU
       {
        HOST_WIDE_INT bitpos = startbitpos;
        tree ftype = TREE_TYPE (f);
-       enum machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (ftype);
+       enum machine_mode mode;
+       if (ftype == error_mark_node)
+         continue;
+       mode = TYPE_MODE (ftype);

        if (DECL_SIZE (f) != 0
            && host_integerp (bit_position (f), 1))

...for completeness?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29030

Reply via email to