This code snippet:

class X
{
  ~X() {}
  void f ()
  {
    X::~X ();
  }
};

violates clause 12.4 ; 12 (explicit destructor calls must use a member
access operator) .  However, the diagnostic given is somewhat confusing:

dstr.c: In member function ‘void X::f()’:
dstr.c:6: error: no matching function for call to ‘X::~X()’
dstr.c:3: note: candidates are: X::~X()


-- 
           Summary: obscure error for attempt to use destructor declarator
                    syntax for destructor call
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29065

Reply via email to