------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-12 05:44 -------
Confirmed, backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0  0x08056d6f in add_candidates (fns=0xb7d536d8, args=0x0,
explicit_targs=0xb7d537c8,
    template_only=1 '\001', conversion_path=0x0, access_path=0x0, flags=3,
candidates=0xbf952f64)
    at ../../gcc/cp/call.c:3615
#1  0x080537a8 in perform_overload_resolution (fn=0xb7d536d8, args=0x0,
candidates=0xbf952f64,
    any_viable_p=0xbf952f63 "\001") at ../../gcc/cp/call.c:2765
#2  0x0805395b in build_new_function_call (fn=0xb7ca1120, args=0x0, koenig_p=0
'\0')
    at ../../gcc/cp/call.c:2813
#3  0x081d5bb0 in finish_call_expr (fn=0xb7ca1120, args=0x0, disallow_virtual=0
'\0',
    koenig_p=0 '\0') at ../../gcc/cp/semantics.c:1843
#4  0x081605e4 in cp_parser_postfix_expression (parser=0xb7d54068, address_p=0
'\0',
    cast_p=0 '\0') at ../../gcc/cp/parser.c:4341


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-09-12 05:44:52
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29021

Reply via email to