------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 18:50 -------
There are most likely a couple of different issues here. A front-end one with
(1.0+0.0i)*(-1) being expanded incorrectly, there is a bug about a case like
that too, see PR 24581. There might even be a libstdc++ one too all depending
on how the complex class is implemented. I have not looked into libstdc++ to
check yet.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28408
