------- Comment #7 from bunk at stusta dot de 2006-09-06 17:22 ------- I don't have a glibc for this target.
But this might be where my problems are coming from: I am able to compile gcc 4.1.1 for at about a dozen targets without having any libc for these targets present. And the resulting compilers work fine for my purposes (cross-compiling Linux kernels). But the configure options I had to figure out for doing this seem to indicate that this is a working but not documented setup. It seems sending a bug report for part of this wasn't the right solution. Is there a good reason why gcc can't officially support being built without a libc by either figuring out that there's no libc itself or by offering some kind of --i-do-not-have-a-libc option to configure? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28962
