[Bug fortran/28866] [Regression] Simple if statements are not so simple

[kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-29 19:47 -------
Subject: Bug 28866

Author: kargl
Date: Tue Aug 29 19:47:31 2006
New Revision: 116570

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116570
Log:
2006-08-29  Steven G. Kargl  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        PR fortran/28866
        * match.c: Wrap copyright.
        (gfc_match_assignment):  Return MATCH_NO for failed lvalue.  Remove
        gotos.  Move error handling of FL_PARAMETER to ...
        * gfc_match_if: Deal with MATCH_NO from above.
        * primary.c: Wrap copyright.
        (match_variable): ... here.  Improve error messages.


2006-08-29  Steven G. Kargl  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        PR fortran/28866
        * gfortran.dg/simpleif_2.f90: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/pr19936_1.f90: Adjust dg-error message.
        * gfortran.dg/enum_5.f90: Ditto.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/primary.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/enum_5.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr19936_1.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/simpleif_2.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28866