------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 17:41 -------
Actually the standard as written requires this behavior, even though the copy
constructor is not called. Anyways the standard has changed with DR 391 so
this is a dup of bug 25950.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25950 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28846
