------- Comment #6 from iano at apple dot com 2006-08-22 00:18 ------- Subject: Re: __builtin_isunordered() and __builtin_isnan() should behave consistently
On Aug 21, 2006, at 5:16 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > ------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 > 00:16 ------- > (In reply to comment #4) >> Pinski, look at the data I presented. >> >> You do not actually return 0 for these cases > > Try it on a real processor instead of x86 which does funny stuff in > the > back-end and does not fully support IEEE math without longer compares. Can I get this reviewed by someone a little less prejudicial, please? Cloned as 28796. Ian -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28795
