------- Comment #8 from etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr 2006-08-18 15:04 ------- > For 4.2.0, it will find it and use it:
Will that be in 4.1.2 (or is it in 4.1 prereleases) or only appear in 4.2 ? > > I was thinking "combined tree" was not as good, mostly because I had to > > select which common part of the trees to keep - and well, I may have > > choosen the binutils ones. > > > gcc should always win over binutils. That's by design. Changes to the > toplevel are almost always driven by changes in gcc -- the binutils tree > is mostly agnostic and just follows what gcc does. The problem I have is that I am nearly always using the latest binutils because I did not get many regressions, but I sometimes regenerate with previous versions of compiler (GCC-3.4.5 or even try GCC-2.95.3) - maybe only for a quick test - and I better not get libiberty from them for binutils... but that is for the other project, with the other processor... Thanks, Etienne. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28770
