------- Comment #7 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 07:23 -------
I believe it should be a MO_COPY, yes, in spite of the REG_DEAD note. That's
because, even though GCC no longer cares about the register content, the value
is actually still there until something else writes to it.
That said, it's not like the patch could hurt, methinks. I'll see if I can
find a deeper cause for the problem using the testcase. Thanks!
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28672
