------- Comment #63 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2006-08-10 15:22 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3
>> If you want a -freassociate-fp math, open an enhancement PR and somebody >> > Ah, you mean like I asked about in end of 2nd paragraph of Comment #56? >> (Independent of this, you should also open a separate PR for ATLAS >> vectorization, because that would not be a regression and would not be >> on x87) :-) >> > You mean like I pleaded for in the last paragraph of Comment #38 Be bold. Don't ask, just open PRs if you feel an issue is separate. Go ahead now if you wish. Having them closed or marked as duplicate is not a problem, and it is much easier to track than cluttering an existing PRs. All these issues with ATLAS will not be visible to somebody looking for bug fixes "known to fail" in 4.2.0, because the original problem is now fixed in that version, and will soon be in 4.1.1 too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27827
