------- Comment #7 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 07:24 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Also one comment about your patch for soft-fp: > + /* Wrap the sequence in REG_LIBCALL / REG_RETVAL notes so that loop > + invariant code motion can move it. */ > > The tree level loop invariant motion should have moved it already. Why use > LIBCALL here when we are already trying to remove it?
That bit is from 2004. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28618
