------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 17:24 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Is it possible that #28493 is a symptom of the same problem? Does anyone > build > the darwin compiler with SjLj exceptions?
Why would they, dwarf-2 eh's overhead is much smaller if throws are not done than sjlj exceptions. Also I think this is a different problem and the problem in the other PR is much older (dates back to 3.3/3.4 at least). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26983
