------- Comment #4 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-02 12:02 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: Optional argument failed
I'll take a look at this as soon as I get home (friday). There is a PR out on PRESENT that I noticed before leaving. I'll try to gather together the problems and sort them out in one fell swoop. Best regards Paul > Message du 31/07/06 02:23 > De : "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Copie à : > Objet : [Bug fortran/28548] [4.2 Regression]: Optional argument failed > > > > ------- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 00:23 ------- > Andrew, I think it is a bug. The language in section 12.4.1.5 is somewhat > convoluted and the description of PRESENT() suggest that PRESENT is special. > > From 12.4.1.5: > > An optional dummy argument that is not present is subject to the > following restrictions: > > (3) It shall not be supplied as an actual argument corresponding to > a nonoptional dummy argument other than as the argument of the > PRESENT intrinsic function. > > (5) If it is an array, it shall not be supplied as an actual argument > to an elemental procedure unless an array of the same rank is > supplied as an actual argument corresponding to a nonoptional dummy > argument of that elemental procedure. > > > 13.14.82 PRESENT (A) > > Description. Determine whether an optional argument is present. > > Class. Inquiry function. > > Argument. 'A' shall be the name of an optional dummy argument > that is accessible in the subprogram in which the > PRESENT function reference appears. It may be of any > type and it may be a pointer. It may be scalar or array > valued. It may be a dummy procedure. The dummy argument > 'A' has no INTENT attribute. > > > -- > > kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28548 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28548
