------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 11:47 -------
No, you are incorrect. Anyways the warnings about ?: are to make sure that you
know that they are different signedness, which might change the behavior
slightly than what you are expecting.
unsigned int baz = 0;
signed int bar = -1;
baz = bar;
This is a different issue and I think is being fixed by the -Wcoercion work.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28488
