------- Comment #9 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-07-23 23:45 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] g++ emits bogus namespace DIE
"drow at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] g++ emits bogus namespace DIE | | On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:03:46PM -0000, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net | wrote: | > I believe the situation has been that clear for DECLs for a long time | > now. | | Hi Gaby, | | Is there supposed to be a "not" in that sentence somewhere? Yes, "obviously". I meant "has NOT been". Sorry for the confusion. I should not hold a baby and answer bugzilla PRs stuff at the same time. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28460
