It would be nice if -Wall would warn that the syntax is wrong if one has a
comma after write() or read() [see example below].
program test
implicit none
write(*,*), 'Hello'
end program test
Such commas are not part of the standard, though several compilers digest them
happily, but not all. Thus it would be nice if such non-standard things could
be found.
NAG f95,e.g., stumbles over the ,:
Error: test.f90, line 3: syntax error
detected at )@,
***Malformed statement
[f95 terminated - errors found by pass 1]
--
Summary: Warn when having superflous comma after read() or
write()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28245
