------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 23:33 ------- FX, > which makes me think that simply having as != NULL is enough to know that it's > not a scalar.
That's my opinion too. I know that it works because I have tried it! I was "persuaded" otherwise after a discussion on the list about another patch. I will submit it as you suggest. > > > One more thing: reading the lines after the code I pasted above reminds me > that > we should check that an elemental function doesn't return a pointer. Could it > be along these lines?: > > + if (sym->attr.elemental && sym->attr.function > + && sym->result->attr.pointer) > + ... > I am separated from my notes tonight; I know I looked at this but I do not recall the outcome. Thanks Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20874
