------- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-15 15:04 ------- This should fix it It looks like gimplify_val never calls mark_new_vars_to_rename, but may create new statements that nothing else gets a handle to.
Index: tree-cfg.c =================================================================== --- tree-cfg.c (revision 114136) +++ tree-cfg.c (working copy) @@ -5584,6 +5584,8 @@ gimplify_val (block_stmt_iterator *bsi, TREE_BLOCK (new_stmt) = TREE_BLOCK (orig_stmt); bsi_insert_before (bsi, new_stmt, BSI_SAME_STMT); + if (in_ssa_p) + mark_new_vars_to_rename (new_stmt); return t; } I'll look at this bug anyway -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27341
