------- Comment #7 from dnovillo at redhat dot com 2006-06-12 12:12 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size with volatile and call to static
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote on 06/05/06 18:37: > Diego, what say you? > Shouldn't COMPLETE_TYPE_P imply that we can compute the size of the type? That's the requisite we need in this case to emit the load from the volatile reference. Otherwise, we have no other choice but to throw it away. ISTM that if COMPLETE_TYPE_P had the right sizeof semantics, we wouldn't need the workaround added for 23167. The only thing the gimplifier can do in this case is throw the reference out, but -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26577
