------- Comment #14 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-06-08 15:37 ------- Well, it shouldn't. My guess could be that we are hitting the case where the logic is flawed. The we fill the cache with the algorithm for say 0x100000085 (but then we only write 0x84 in the cache), and then use it for 0x85. The synth_mult logic then could be resilient enough to not generate wrong code but just code with wrong cost measures.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27733
