------- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-08 01:50 -------
It seems that r114364 adds the extra alignment for non bit-field
fields always for the ms_bitfield_layout_p case. It looks the packed
attribute should be taken into account, though I'm unsure whether
it's the way of ms_bitfield or not. How does this look?
--- ORIG/trunk/gcc/stor-layout.c 2006-06-06 10:02:03.000000000 +0900
+++ LOCAL/trunk/gcc/stor-layout.c 2006-06-07 23:16:01.000000000 +0900
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ update_alignment_for_field (record_layou
the type, except that for zero-size bitfields this only
applies if there was an immediately prior, nonzero-size
bitfield. (That's the way it is, experimentally.) */
- if (!is_bitfield
+ if ((!is_bitfield && !DECL_PACKED (field))
|| (!integer_zerop (DECL_SIZE (field))
? !DECL_PACKED (field)
: (rli->prev_field
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27942
