------- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-07 03:23 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Alright, but, it seems strange that code that worked 2 months ago is suddenly > broken due to a bug filed 6 years ago. The "Regression" status of this > particular situation and this particular code seems to get lost when calling > it > a dupe.
The code changed which caused PR 1305 to show its head, csm posted a workaround to the java-patches list so someone will most likely apply it. And the regression part of this bug is not lost by calling the bug as a dup because the work around was posted. Yes it is semi weird an old bug to show its head causing this regression when the library changes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27908
