------- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:12
-------
> Isn't this just a duplicate of 23541? We have it marked as depending on
> 23541,
> but why keep both open?
It essentially is, but this one is much more severe since there is no
workaround.
> On it's own, I'd call this a P2, but 23541 is a P1 for sure.
In my opinion, it's the other way around.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26507
