------- Comment #29 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-06-04 17:35 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Build failure: undefined symbol __floatunsitf
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #28 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:19 > ------- > Joseph -- > > Would you please summarize the current state of this bug, and whether or not > you intend to do any more work on it? I'm trying to figure out how to > prioritize it for 4.2. The state is still as in comment#23 and I don't intend to do any more work on it (though I could do the US_SOFTWARE_GOFAST removal if desired). * MIPS16 (mips16.S needs implementations of the relevant functions, mips_init_libfuncs should arrange for them to be called) - preferably to be done by someone set up to test MIPS16. * FRV - see comment#9 - could do with knowledge of the intent behind the C functions such as __uitod and again with someone to test on FRV. * US_SOFTWARE_GOFAST - should be removed - see my list at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-05/msg00440.html> of the various pieces to remove. * powerpc-linux glibc -mabi=ieeelongdouble - not supported by glibc in any meaningful way but it does provide the ABI-mandated functions for arithmetic on IEEE long double; however, there is a glibc bug whereby it provides _q_uitoq instead of the correct name _q_utoq which GCC will now call. There is no GCC bug here since GCC calls the ABI-specified function. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24998
