------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 16:31 ------- D.1024_166 = COMPLEX_EXPR <zkq_165, 0.0>; D.1025_167 = 1.0e+0 - D.1024_166;
That is wrong, that 1.0 should be complex_cst < 1.0e+0, 0.0> -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|tree-optimization |middle-end http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27773