------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-05-26 16:31 -------
  D.1024_166 = COMPLEX_EXPR <zkq_165, 0.0>;
  D.1025_167 = 1.0e+0 - D.1024_166;

That is wrong, that 1.0 should be complex_cst < 1.0e+0, 0.0>


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|tree-optimization           |middle-end


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27773

Reply via email to