------- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-22 09:28
-------
RTH, you wrote in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00972.html :
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:24:34AM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > * omp-low.c (expand_omp_parallel): If child_cfun->cfg, free
> > dominators,
> > post dominators and cleanup cfg before returning.
>
> I had moved the cleanup_tree_cfg out to the top-level because
> the cleanup invalidated basic blocks in the omp_region tree.
> Perhaps that's fixed by your sched_kind fix. If so, we should
> simpy revert my previous fix, likely.
>
> I guess I'll look into this after pre-processing my post-vacation
> mailbox.
Is there any progress on this PR?
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25874
