------- Comment #15 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-05-21 20:36 -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > No news about this one. Frankly, since x86-* would not benefit in any way, I
> > consider the work low priority.
> 
> What about x86_64

Of course by x86-* I meant to include x86_64.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24692

Reply via email to