------- Comment #15 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-05-21 20:36 ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > No news about this one. Frankly, since x86-* would not benefit in any way, I > > consider the work low priority. > > What about x86_64
Of course by x86-* I meant to include x86_64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24692