------- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 22:15 -------
> Thomas, can you give it a try since you designed the original patch? Actually, I didn't; I completely missed the original test case, checked this with my own (which didn't expose the error) and then rashly concluded that this was indeed fixed. Sorry. I'll have a look at this, though. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25073
