------- Comment #10 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-05-08 09:46 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > It appears that the original testcase, involving INT in as specification > expression, is valid F95 and F2003. It was not valid F90, however, because the > return type of INT is real. This is confirmed by the results of different > compilers and Bob Corbett on c.l.f, so I'm closing this one as INVALID.
FX, I do not understand why you are closing this one as INVALID, since you just argued that it VALID F95 and F2003. Anyway, current gfortran seems to accept this code, so this issue appears resolved. Please do not break it! ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18271
