------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 15:04 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > There are several problems with the current SEE implementation: > > 1. SEE uses NEXT_INSN/PREV_INSN to find adjacent insns to check if SEE > is safe. But with -g, NEXT_INSN/PREV_INSN may point to a NOTE: >
That one is easy to fix. Please post a patch to using next_nonnote_insn/prev_nonnote_insn instead. And then the -O3 (without -g) is a different issue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27437
