------- Comment #6 from dnovillo at redhat dot com 2006-05-01 16:11 ------- Subject: Re: [gomp] firstprivate not working properly with non-POD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 16:07 ------- > We do need a barrier (well, in some cases with extra code we can avoid > it in some cases), in order to honor 2.8.3.4: > "If a list item appears in both firstprivate and lastprivate clauses, the > update > required for lastprivate occurs after all the initializations for > firstprivate." > Ah, yes, of course. Sorry about that. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEVjMVUTa2oAUaiwQRAkViAJ4s5n62EohuFxCUWVQGZ1owtoSTcACfZR7i NgLf43AMmOQ0xLmnl89ZkYQ= =cjzg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26943
