------- Comment #4 from laszlo dot szakony at philips dot com 2006-04-21 07:49 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Can you give some sources that don't use automake? Because it is hard to > follow what is wrong in this bug.
I have uploaded a simple test without automake files. Actually this bug (if it is a bug) prevents me to use the "windows-like" visibility feature of gcc 4.0. A short explanation: I have ported a project (one dll) from windows, that exports ca. 1200 symbols. After porting to Linux without using the "windows-like" visibility (exporting all symbols on the IF) the number of visible symbols was ca. 75000. I was really happy as I heard of the visibilty feature of gcc 4.0. I implemented that feature as described in http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility. The result: The number of exported symols was ca:70000. And the test crashed. After several days I could identify the place of the crash, and I coud create this smaller example. If this "bug" is fixed, is still a question for me: Why is the big difference "1200-Windows" vs. "70000-Linux" in the exported symbols? -- laszlo dot szakony at philips dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laszlo dot szakony at | |philips dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26846
