------- Comment #20 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-04-20 11:56 ------- Everything considered, I don't think there is something to fix here, either in the compiler (and all the other compilers I tried bahaves the same of current g++ on Comment #18, irrespective of the position of the overloaded operator, of course) or in the library: agreed, std::fill_n could be made more robust restricting the second template argument, but this is really matter for C++0x. Otherwise, the problem would immediately go away if vector<>::iterator were a plain pointer, but that is not an option for our implementation.
Agreed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26974
