------- Comment #7 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2006-04-20 03:46 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> The problem pretty clearly had something to do with overloading operator,() 
> and
> a call inside the STL leaking out to an overload in our code, because it went
> away when I changed the name of our operator. However, I wasn't able to reduce
> the case.

I believe you that it had to do with operator, -- there is just nothing that
I can do to figure out what is going on without a testcase that I can
compile, run, and let crash :-(

W.


-- 

bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26974

Reply via email to