------- Comment #19 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2006-04-19 11:09 ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Probably this PR should be suspended, while waiting for the resolution of DR > 456: > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#456
Whether the situation remains the same or the g++ implementation becomes legal does not change the fact that it would be nice (and not at all out of reach) to use the features of glibc and solaris (any others?) that allow a cleaner global namespace when including a <cxxx> header, it would just lower the priority of this from bug to wishitem. And for platforms where it is not possible, then the current implementation will have to remain, whatever the committee decides. But if you want to suspend it, it is your call... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6257
